Rock Binders, Inc.

Home
SEAM
ARP
Laboratory
Procedure
Safety
About Us
History
Contact Us

SULPHUR ASPHALT PELLET
PERFORMANCE IN THE
ASPHALT PAVEMENT ANALYZER

SCOPE:

Two forms of sulphur/asphalt pellets were evaluated for performance in the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA).  Performance was measured in terms of resistance to rutting, resistance to fatigue failure, and resistance to moisture damage. A 4.75 mm asphalt mix was used to prepare test specimen with each of the two forms of sulphur pellets.  In addition control specimens were prepared with PG67-22 asphalt cement.

SULPHUR PELLETS:

Sulphur Extended Asphalt Modifier (SEAM) was one of the pellet forms and the other was Asphalt Replacement Pellets (ARP).  The Specific gravity of SEAM was determined to be 1.927 and accompanying literature suggested it should be substituted for 30 to 50% of the asphalt cement.  ARP specific gravity was determined to be 1.619 and it is a total replacement for asphalt.  Melting point was determined to be 240 to 250 degrees F for these products.

MIX DESIGN:

The 4.75mm maximum nominal size mix design used in this study represented quarry crushed aggregate with all faces crushed.  Characteristics of the design are in table 1.

Mix Design Characteristics
Table 1

Sieve Size Percent Passing
Inches Millimeters
3/8 9.5 100
#4 4.75 68
#8 2.36 45
#16 1.18 34
#30 0.60 25
#50 0.30 18
#100 0.15 10
#200 0.075 6
Asphalt Content% 5.8

SPECIMENS PREPARATION:

The control specimens were prepared by adding the asphalt cement at 320 degrees F to the aggregate at 350 degrees F and mixing until the aggregate was well coated.  This required 30 - 40 seconds.

Test specimens were prepared with 45% of the asphalt cement replaced with SEAM.  The weight percentage of asphalt cement was 3.19% (0.55 x 5.8 = 3.19), and 4.91% SEAM by weight was used (5.8 x 0.45 x 1.927 +1.025 = 4.91%).  Asphalt cement at 320 degrees F was added to the aggregate at 350 degrees F and the mixing began prior to adding the SEAM at room temperature. Coating the aggregate required 60 - 70 seconds.

Test specimens were prepared using ARP.  The weight percentage was adjusted to 9.16% (5.8 x 1.619 + 1.025 = 9.16, where the 1.025 is the approximate specific gravity of the asphalt cement).  The ARP was added at room temperature to aggregate at 350 degrees F and mixed until the aggregate was well coated.  This required 100 to 120 seconds.  The resulting mixture had little cohesive character.  In a second attempt the aggregate was heated to 325 degrees F.  Cohesion of this mix was much improved.

AGING AND COMPACTING:

All specimens were short term aged for two hours at 300 degrees F in accordance with Superpave procedures, and immediately compacted to a targeted 7 +/- 1% air voids in the Asphalt Vibratory Compactor (AVC).

Specimens prepared for testing resistance to fatigue failure were compacted then aged in an oven at 185 degrees F (85 degrees C) for five (5) days prior to testing.

RUT TESTING:

Test specimens and control specimens were heated to 64 degrees C (147 degrees F) in the APA test chamber and tested for resistance to rutting in accordance with the test method.  Results are in Table 2.

Rut Depth mm
Table 2

Specimens 1 2 Average
Control 10.8 7.3 9.1
SEAM 1.8 1.2 1.5
ARP 1.0 0.5 0.8

SEAM was 6 times more resistant to rutting than the control while ARP was more than 11 times more resistant that the control specimens.  SEAM can be substituted for 30 to 50% of the asphalt cement.  Forty-five percent (45%) SEAM was substituted in these test specimens; therefore the heavy dosage produced the high resistance to rutting.

FATIGUE RESISTANCE:

The test specimens and control specimens were cooled to 20 degrees C (68 degrees F) in the APA and tested for resistance to fatigue in accordance with the test method.  Results are in Table 3.

Fatigue Resistance Cycles to Failure
Table 3

Specimens 1 2 Average
Control 24,906 15,740 20,323
SEAM 87,204* 87,204* 87,204*
ARP 31,872 28,840 30,356

* These specimens showed no indication of weakening after 87204 wheel cycles therefore the test was discontinued.

The ARP specimens were 1.5 times more resistant to fatigue than the specimens containing the neat asphalt.  Testing of the specimens containing SEAM showed no evidence of weakening after more than 87,000 cycles therefore wheel cycling was discontinued.  This is greater than 4 times more cycles than the control specimen was able to withstand.

MOISTURE DAMAGE RESISTANCE:

Moisture testing was performed in general accord with the Hamberg method of test.  A load of 108.5 pounds was applied through 0.5 square inches wheel contact with the submerged specimen to produce an applied contact stress of 217 psi.  Wheel cycling was applied until the APA graph produced a stripping slope on which the Stripping Inflection Point could be established.  Results are in Table 4.

Moisture Damage Resistance
Table 4

Sets
(Control or Test Set)
Hamburg Simulated Stripping
Inflection Point Cycles*
Control 2,650
SEAM 2,430
ARP 2,300

* Tests performed using steel wheels in the APA with specimens submerged in water at 50 degrees C.

The Stripping Inflection Point cycles suggest that the resistance to moisture damage for specimens containing sulphur differed very little from the control set.

All testing was done by Mr. Ron Collins of  Pavement Technologies Inc.
Covington, Georgia (770) 388-0909 ....thank you Sir Ron.

HOME || ABOUT US || SAFETY